Fair Play: Harnessing AI and Fan Feedback to Revolutionize Sports Officiating

Introduction

In my last two posts, I discussed the importance of bridging bias in AI systems with responsible human oversight and examined the evolving nature of the American justice system. The common thread in both discussions was that technological solutions, coupled with human input, often yield better outcomes than either human judgment or AI alone. This same principle can readily apply to something near and dear to many of us: sports.

From Referee to RHLF: A New Take on Officiating

The notion of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF)—where an AI model refines its decision-making by learning from real-world responses—has intriguing potential in sports. Traditionally, referees and umpires make instantaneous calls, often with limited visibility or under high-pressure circumstances. Instant replay reviews help mitigate error, but they are still limited to a few officials interpreting the footage. RLHF offers a chance to infuse broader perspectives—particularly from fans—into in-game decision-making.

In sports, the human feedback component typically comes from:

Referees/Umpires/Video Officials: The official, traditional source of rulings.
Coaches/Players: They provide real-time reactions (and challenges in some sports) to referee calls.
Fans: While traditionally relegated to cheering and jeering, fans are an enormous reservoir of collective observation that could be harnessed more effectively.

The Hypothetical “Crowd Wisdom” Replay System

Imagine a platform, integrated into broadcast and streaming apps, that invites fans to weigh in on contested plays in real time. Immediately after an official initiates a review:

AI Analysis: A custom AI model—trained on thousands of game scenarios—makes an initial determination about the call.
Expert Reviewer: A “lead referee AI” (trained through RLHF) presents the most likely ruling based on historical data, angles, and context (e.g., time remaining, type of foul or violation).
Fan Polling: Fans watching the game receive a prompt on their devices, displaying the relevant replay footage from multiple angles. They cast a vote on the correct call (e.g., foul, no foul, goal, no goal, offside, safe, out, etc.).
Aggregated Decision: The system weights the AI’s call, the lead officials’ input, and fan votes to arrive at a recommended ruling.

The key difference from current officiating systems (such as the NFL’s replay command center, MLB’s video review room, or soccer’s Video Assistant Referee (VAR)) is the addition of fan-based crowdsourcing to enhance the decision. This “wisdom of the crowd” approach—popularized by James Surowiecki’s The Wisdom of Crowds—posits that large groups of diverse, independent observers can reach surprisingly accurate conclusions.

Preventing “Fan Gaming”: Mitigation Strategies

Of course, sports fans are famously partisan. The largest risk in leveraging their feedback is that a majority of fans may vote reflexively in favor of their preferred team, skewing the results. To address this issue, consider the following safeguards:

Weighted Voting and Reputation Scores
- Each fan’s vote could carry a dynamic “reputation score” that increases over time for accurate calls and decreases for proven inaccuracies or biases.
- Fans who consistently vote in line with the eventual correct decision (as determined by official reviews) earn higher credibility. Overly partisan voters see their weighting decrease.
- Similar “karma” or “reputation” systems exist on social platforms (e.g., Reddit) and in some online games, indicating real-world viability.
Blind Voting
- During the replay, the system may anonymize which team stands to benefit. For calls like “Out or Safe?” in baseball, fans may only see the relevant part of the clip (runner approaching base) without scoreboard context.
- Masking team logos, colors, or names in certain angles can diminish knee-jerk team loyalty. In high-stakes situations, a slight delay or partial data approach can help ensure fans vote on the action rather than the team.
Demographic and Location Balancing
- The system can track the geographic location of voters or their self-identified fan affiliation (if disclosed in a profile). Votes from the same region or known fan affiliation can be proportionally balanced by neutral or opposing viewpoints.
- If 70% of votes come from a single region known to favor a specific team, the algorithm rebalances the result by weighting external regions more heavily.
AI-Driven Anomaly Detection
- The system can incorporate anomaly detection algorithms to flag suspicious voting spikes or patterns. For instance, if thousands of new accounts suddenly appear mid-game to sway a call, these votes could be discounted.
- Similar real-time anomaly detection technology is used in cybersecurity for distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.
Limited Influence
- Even with crowdsourcing, the final call might remain with an official or an AI-official system that integrates multiple data points. Fan input is part of the puzzle, not the only determinant.

Potential Benefits and Considerations

Enhanced Transparency and Inclusivity
By allowing fans to actively participate in the officiating process, leagues could foster deeper fan engagement. This heightened sense of involvement might lead to greater trust in the fairness of outcomes.
Real-Time Feedback Loop
With thousands or millions of eyes on the replay, the AI system benefits from immediate reinforcement learning. Over time, the model refines its predictive power on disputed calls, identifying new patterns or angles that humans might miss.
Ethical and Technological Hurdles
- Data Privacy: Collecting and processing fan data in real time requires robust encryption and compliance with data protection laws (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).
- Internet Access and Connectivity: Relying on fan input could disadvantage those with limited broadband or streaming capability, raising fairness questions for global sports.
- Implementation Costs: Designing and maintaining a real-time high-capacity polling system can be expensive and technologically complex.

Research and Evidence Base

VAR (Video Assistant Referee) Studies
- Academic analyses of VAR in soccer have shown that technology-assisted decisions reduce errors but introduce new controversies regarding transparency and delays.
- Source: Kolbinger, O., & Link, D. (2021). “VAR—Video Assistant Referees in Elite Soccer: A Medical or Technical Problem?” Frontiers in Sports and Active Living.
Wisdom of Crowds
- James Surowiecki’s seminal work demonstrates that aggregated input from diverse groups often outperforms individual experts.
- Source: Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor Books.
Crowdsourcing and Reputation Systems
- Numerous scholarly articles investigate how crowdsourcing platforms (e.g., Mechanical Turk) maintain quality control via reputation or weighting systems.
- Source: Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods.
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
- While widely discussed in AI ethic circles, RLHF has also been tested in content moderation and games to refine AI decision-making.
- Source: Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). “Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).

Conclusion

By merging AI-driven replay analysis with crowdsourced fan feedback, sports leagues could make officiating both more transparent and more engaging. While partisanship among fans is an undeniable reality, carefully designed weighting, anonymity measures, and anomaly detection can mitigate unfair manipulation. If implemented responsibly, this approach would not only reduce errors in crucial moments but also harness the “wisdom of the crowd” to heighten the thrill and fairness of competitive sports.

Just as the American justice system grapples with integrating technology while preserving due process, sports officiating can evolve in a similar way—merging cutting-edge AI with well-structured human (and fan) input. The result could be a system that both speeds up officiating and reinforces the trust and excitement that keep us tuning in, cheering, and debating, season after season.

Professional Referee Organization (PRO): Publications and guidelines on VAR usage in soccer, detailing how officials incorporate technology.
Source: www.proreferees.com
NBA Replay Center: Explains how multi-angle replays are processed and officiated.
Source: official.nba.com
MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference: Annual research and presentations on data-driven innovations in sports, including officiating technologies.
Source: www.sloansportsconference.com

By drawing lessons from existing replay systems, crowdsourcing platforms, and RLHF best practices, sports leagues can chart a path toward a more robust, participatory officiating model.

Articles and Presentations

Author, “Treasury Suspends Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act & Proposes Narrowed Scope,” Greater Phoenix InBusiness, March 6, 2025
Co-Author, “NIL Agents: The Good, the Bad, and the Unregulated,” Fennemore Blog, March 4, 2025
Author, “Considerations for Arizona businesses as the U.S. signals potential shift toward AI-based digital assets,” Phoenix Business Journal, March 1, 2025
Co-Author, “A patchwork of name, image and likeness agent regulations leaves student-athletes largely unprotected,” Phoenix Business Journal, March 1, 2025
Author, “Lessons From Developing A CTA Compliance Application,” Law360, February 12, 2025
Author, “The New Administration’s Impact on AI and Digital Assets,” Greater Phoenix InBusiness, February 2025
Presenter, “The 2025 Forecast for the Legislative Session,” Arizona Corporation Commission, January 31, 2025.
Presenter, “The World of AI: Benefits and Perils for General Counsel,” Arizona Corporation Commission, January 31, 2025.
Author, “Lessons from Developing A CTA Compliance Application,” Law360, January 27, 2025
Author, “Trump’s impact on AI and digital assets: What business owners need to know,” AZ Big Media, January 14, 2025
Author, “Trump’s impact on AI and digital assets: What business owners need to know,” Arizona Capitol Times, January 13, 2025
Author, “What Arizona businesses should know about the incoming administration’s impact on AI and digital assets,” Daily Independent, January 9, 2025
Quoted, “For small business owners in Arizona and elsewhere, Jan. 1 disclosure rule not in effect,” AZ Central, December 20, 2024
Moderator, “Innovation at Small and Mid-Sized Law Firms,” The Legal Tech Fund Summit, December 2024
Presenter, “DEFI, Stable Coins and NFTs, Blockchain and Patents,” Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies Law & Policy Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, November 5, 2024
Presenter, “Hadera AI Working Group: AI, Smart Contracts and Digital Assets,” November 5, 2024
Presenter, “Supply Chains, Blockchains and Real Estate,” Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies Law & Policy Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, October 22, 2024
Presenter, “Smart Contracts, Blockchains and AI,” Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies Law & Policy Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, October 8, 2024
Presenter, “Bitcoin – A Case Study,” Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies Law & Policy Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, September 10, 2024
Presenter, “The Ethics of AI in Legal Practice,” Second Western Agricultural & Environmental Law Conference, June 14, 2024
Panelist, “SCG Legal – AI Working Group. AI and Ethics panel discussion,” May 23, 2024
Presenter, “LegalTech Boston: AI, Legal Work Remix and Alternative Fee Arrangements,” May 17, 2024
Author, “As March Madness concludes, athletes and businesses looking for NIL deals should consider these legal risks,” Phoenix Business Journal, April 4, 2024
Author, “Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) Compensation for Student Athletes,” Arizona Attorney Magazine, April 4, 2024
Presenter, “AI Legal Tech for In House Counsel,” March 19, 2024
Presenter, “CLE: Litigation update: Name, Image and Likeness & NCAA,” March 7, 2024
Presenter, “Digital Assets, AI And Technology solutions for Trusts and Estates,” January 16, 2024
Author, “Corporate Transparency Act takes aim at financial crime,” Capitol Times, January 12, 2024
Author, “Considerations for Business and Student Athletes – Negotiating Name Image and Likeness Deals,” NIL Deals, January 4, 2024
Author, “What You Need to Know About Corporate Transparency Act,” Phoenix Business Journal and Horizon, January 2, 2024
Author, “Corporate Transparency Act to Enhance Economic Transparency in Business,” Arizona PBS, January 2, 2024
Author, “Fennemore exec down new Corporate Transparency Act requirements,” Phoenix Business Journal, January 2, 2024
Author, “How to prepare for implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act on Jan. 1,” AZ Big Media, December 20, 2023
Featuring, “Student Athletes and Getting Paid for Their Name,” New At 3, November 9, 2023
Featuring, “Blockchain Beyond Business: A Look at ASU’S Relationship with Cybersecurity Technology,” The State Press, March 21, 2023
Author, “Legacy Businesses: Setting up baby boomers for success,” Lovin’ Life After 50, November 14, 2022
Featuring, ” Legacy Businesses for 55+,” Arizona PBS, September 27, 2022
Featuring, “The Importance of a Proper Business Exit Strategy,” Next Avenue, September 13, 2022
Author, “How Baby Boomers can set up success in the sale of legacy businesses,” Daily Independent, August 26, 2022
Author, “Setting Baby Boomers up for success in the sale of legacy businesses,” Arizona Digital Free Press, August 2022
Author, “Setting Baby Boomers Up for Success in the Sale of Legacy Businesses,” inBusiness, August 2022
Co-Author, “Experts: Is it OK to pay your employees in Bitcoin?” Daily Independent, June 2, 2022
Co-Author, ” Is it OK to pay employees in Bitcoin?” AZ Big Media, May 26, 2022
Co-Author, “Is it time to start paying your employees in cryptocurrency?” Phoenix Business Journal, May 24, 2022
Author, “My View: Purchasing NFT art and sports memorabilia is the rage — but buyer beware,” Phoenix Business Journal, April 20, 2022
Quoted, “So, you want to take your paycheck in bitcoin?” Morning Brew, March 31, 2022
Interview, “Britney Spears Conservatorship Hearing,” Fox 10 Phoenix, November 18, 2021
Author, “My View: Why Bitcoin is gaining critical legitimacy as new asset class,” November 9, 2021
Interview, “Britney Conservatorship Hearing,” Fox 10 Phoenix, August 19, 2021
Quoted, “Britney Conservatorship Hearing,” Fox 10 Phoenix, June 23, 2021
Podcast, “Lessons Learned from the Rich and Famous with David McCarville,” Fenn.Talks Podcast, June 17, 2021
Interview, “At the Center of a Paradigm Shift,” Fennemore Blog, June 10, 2021
Interview, “Attorney David McCarville speaks about the importance of designating a power of attorney,” Arizona PBS, May 26, 2021
Quoted, “Will Bitcoin Ever Be Accepted Widely as a Form of Payment?” GO Banking Rates, April 29, 2021
Quoted, “Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s first tweet sold for $2.9 million on Sunday. The buyer said it’s the Mona Lisa of tweets,” Insider, March 24, 2021
Author, “Hospitals Required to Provide Patients With Transparent Pricing,” Fennemore Client Alert, September 2, 2020
Quoted, “Why Do Enterprise Blockchain Systems Fail? (Exclusive),” E-Crypto News, June 9, 2020
Quoted, “Demystifying Cryptocurrencies: Promise and Potential Lead to Growing Appeal,” Destination CRM, May 29, 2020
Presenter, “Key Blockchain Concepts for Corporate Counsel,” Association of Corporate Counsel, March 12, 2020
Presenter, “The Future of the Practice of Law and Blockchain Technology,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, December 2, 2019
Presenter, “Blockchain Technology as a Legal Tool,” Valley Estate Planners, November 21, 2019
Presenter, “Blockchain for Lawyers,” Lawyers Networking Group Continuing Legal Education, October 23, 2019
Presenter, “Supply Chain and Real Estate Applications,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, October 21, 2019
Presenter, “Smart Contracts,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, September 23, 2019
Presenter, “Bitcoin: A Case Study,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, August 26, 2019
Presenter, “Course Overview,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, August 21, 2019
Presenter, “Estate Planning Mistakes of the Rich and Famous,” Comerica Bank, August 20, 2019
Presenter, “Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies,” Great West Financial, July 10, 2019
Presenter, “Blockchain: From Digital Currency to Smart Contracts and Beyond,” Arizona State Bar Convention, June 27, 2019
Presenter, “Industrial Hemp Market and Regulatory Overview,” Commerce Bank of Arizona, June 25, 2019
Presenter, “Estate Planning Mistakes of the Rich and Famous,” Pinnacle Peak Luxury Home Tour, June 7, 2019
Presenter, “Estate Planning Mistakes of the Rich and Famous,” Walt Danley Christie’s International Real Estate, April 24, 2019
Presenter, “Pitfalls to Avoid in Estate Planning,” Merrill Lynch, April 9, 2019
Presenter, “Legal Blockchain for Bright Beginners,” ASU Arkfield e-Discovery and Digital Evidence Conference, March 6, 2019
Panelist, “Smart Contracts and Blockchain Subcommittee,” American Bar Association Cyberspace Law Institute and Winter Working Meeting, January 24, 2019
Panelist, “Smart Contracts, Logistics, International Implications, and Future Applications,” Arizona Technology Council and Arizona Cyber Threat Response Alliance 2018 Cybersecurity Lunch Forum, December 12, 2018
Presenter, “The Future of Blockchain,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, November 20, 2018
Presenter, “International Use Cases for Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, November 6, 2018
Presenter, “Blockchain Technology in Real Estate and Supply Chain/Logistics,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, October 16, 2018
Presenter, “Pitfalls to Avoid in Estate Planning,” Merrill Lynch, October 3, 2018
Presenter, “The Legal Impacts of Blockchain Technology,” Arizona State Bar Intellectual Property Section, October 16, 2018
Presenter, “Smart Contracts,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, September 25, 2018
Presenter, “Legal Implications of Blockchain Technology,” Scottsdale Estate Planners, September 13, 2018
Presenter, “Bitcoin: A Case Study,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, August 28, 2018
Presenter, “Course Overview,” ASU Law School: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law and Policy, August 21, 2018
Presenter, “Legal Implications of Blockchain Technology,” Maricopa Country Bar Association, June 1, 2018
Presenter, “Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies,” Finemark National Bank & Trust, March 15, 2018

from FutureProof Legal https://ift.tt/i4MXOeT
via IFTTT

FutureProof Legal

Search This Blog